Comparing Apple M4 Pro vs. Intel Xeon W-3275
Below you can compare the latest CPU-s across multiple benchmarks. Explore detailed graphs, performance scores, and rankings to quickly find the model that best suits your workflow and creative needs.
Verdict
The Apple M4 Pro is 14% slower than the Xeon W-3275
Cinebench R20
Cinema 4D render farm arrow_forwardCinebench R23
Cinema 4D render farm arrow_forwardCinebench 2024
Cinema 4D render farm arrow_forwardCinebench R15
Cinema 4D render farm arrow_forwardV-Ray benchmark
V-Ray render farm arrow_forwardBlender benchmark
Blender render farm arrow_forwardCinebench 2026
Cinema 4D render farm arrow_forwardScores marked with * are estimated from the other benchmarks we have for that device.
Buy a card or render on the farm
Your Apple M4 Pro or 100+ GPUs at once?
Drop & Render
Estimated with our live price calculator for 250 frames. Local times scale with V-Ray benchmark scores; farm times assume enough free nodes. From €94.03 on Sapphire.
Ranking by benchmarks
Cinebench R20
Cinebench R23
Cinebench 2024
Cinebench R15
V-Ray benchmark
Blender benchmark
Cinebench 2026
Methodology
Our data above is compiled from multiple sources:
-
Our own benchmarks: We conduct extensive testing with the GPU and CPU models we use on the farm. Over the past 10 years we have tested over 1,000 GPUs and 500 CPUs.
-
Model scores: Once we have two or more benchmarks for a device we can perform some machine learning computations to estimate a realistic score in any of the other benchmarks we list. These are always marked with an asterisk (*), and while usually accurate shouldn't be taken as the complete truth.
-
Public benchmark data: We may supplement our dataset with scores from public OctaneBench, V-Ray Benchmark and Blender Benchmark websites. We cannot test every device available ourselves, so this gives us a nice alternative to get You the results you are looking for.
We'll start you off with €25 credits!
Supported software
Pipeline
Company details
Confirm